In their own words
No description from the operator yet. If you manage this facility, claim this listing to tell families your side — and respond to the record below. Claimed pages also stop showing nearby alternatives: the page becomes yours alone.
The record
CMS Care Compare · Jul 2026| Overall | ★★★☆☆ 3 of 5 |
| Health inspection | ★★☆☆☆ 2 of 5 |
| Staffing | ★★★★★ 5 of 5 |
| Quality measures | ★★★☆☆ 3 of 5 |
Staffing · hours per resident per day
Medication & safety · share of long-stay residents
| Federal fines | $0 · zero penalties |
| Abuse icon | ⚠ Present |
| Conflict flags in latest reconcile | 4 |
DE does not publish a state inspection feed Palmelle can verify. This record is built from federal data only.
What the pattern says
Palmelle pattern checks · v1Warehouse warning signs — read the findings below before touring.
- The falls number is the outlier: 2× the national rate. 3.5% of long-stay residents had a fall with major injury vs 1.6% nationally. Combined with the staffing picture, ask hard questions: one bad cluster, a reporting artifact, or a real problem.
- CMS has placed an abuse icon on this facility. A substantiated finding of abuse, neglect, or exploitation is on the federal record.
These checks are computed the same way for every facility. Good patterns and bad ones both print.
Nearby & comparable
Same records, same rulesQuestions families ask
What is the CMS rating for GILPIN HALL?
GILPIN HALL has an overall CMS Care Compare rating of 3 out of 5 stars.
Has GILPIN HALL been cited for resident harm?
CMS has placed an abuse icon on GILPIN HALL, indicating a substantiated finding of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
What should I ask on a tour?
Ask about staff-to-resident ratios by shift, weekend coverage, and any measure flagged red in the record above — those are the places this facility's numbers leave open questions.